Abstract
We examine how the mandatory adoption of extended auditor's reports (EARs) affects managerial bad-news hoarding through the lens of stock price crash risk. Relying on the UK's auditing standard change in 2013 as a quasi-natural experiment, we document a crash risk reduction for firms that were required to adopt EARs, relative to firms that were not so required. The crash risk reduction is related to EARs' disclosure of risks of material misstatement in revenue recognition. The negative effect of EARs adoption on crash risk is more pronounced for firms with scant public information and firms with non-Big-4 or non-industry-specialist auditors. EARs adoption induces firms to disclose more smaller pieces of negative information without changing firms' accruals management. Taken together, our results suggest that EARs adoption dampens bad-news hoarding by managers.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
