Abstract

Providing artificial eggs is a commonly used technique to understand brood parasitism, mainly by the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus). However, the presence of a cuckoo egg in the host nest would also require an earlier physical presence of the common cuckoo within the host territory. During our study of the red-backed shrike (Lanius collurio), we tested two experimental approaches: (1) providing an artificial “cuckoo” egg in shrike nests and (2) additionally placing a stuffed common cuckoo with a male call close to the shrike nest. We expected that the shrikes subject to the additional common cuckoo call stimuli would be more sensitive to brood parasitism and demonstrate a higher egg rejection rate. In the years 2017–2018, in two locations in Poland, a total of 130 red-backed shrike nests were divided into two categories: in 66 we added only an artificial egg, and in the remaining 64 we added not only the egg, but also presented a stuffed, calling common cuckoo. Shrikes reacted more strongly if the stuffed common cuckoo was present. However, only 13 incidences of egg acceptance were noted, with no significant differences between the locations, experimental treatments or their interaction. Analysis of breeding success revealed significant differences between the locations, between experimental treatments and their interaction, which suggests a strong location effect. The red-backed shrike is an efficient rejector of foreign eggs. It would be interesting to see how similar tests affect hosts that have much higher rates of brood parasitism and egg acceptance.

Highlights

  • Breeding parasitism reduces the reproductive success of hosts; hosts have evolved anti-parasitic strategies (Dawkins and Krebs 1979; Rothstein and Robinson 1998)

  • We investigated aggressive behaviour of shrikes towards the dummy common cuckoo

  • Shrikes mobbing the dummy common cuckoo were supported by barred warbler Sylvia nisoria

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Breeding parasitism reduces the reproductive success of hosts; hosts have evolved anti-parasitic strategies (Dawkins and Krebs 1979; Rothstein and Robinson 1998). The most widespread and effective anti-parasitic behaviour is egg rejection, and the ejection of a foreign egg in some species occurs in more than 90% of clutches (Honza et al 2007; Soler et al 2017), but a wide range of rejection rates have been documented (Lovászi and Moskát 2004). Hosts can reject a parasitic egg by deserting the clutch, but the frequency of this defence mechanism is usually many times lower than egg ejection (Moskát and Honza 2002; Servedio and Hauber 2006; Schulze-Hagen et al 2009). The defence mechanism at the nestling stage may evolve when host defence at the egg stage is evaded by the parasite

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call