Does evidence support “banking/extending sleep” by shift workers to mitigate fatigue, and/or to improve health, safety, or performance? A systematic review

Abstract

BackgroundSleep deprivation is common in shift work occupations, including safety-sensitive occupations. While extending sleep prior to scheduled shifts (i.e., “banking sleep”) may be an intuitive strategy for fatigue mitigation, the evidence behind this strategy is unclear. MethodsWe performed a systematic review of literature retrieved in searches of four databases. We examined agreement between two independent screeners, abstracted key findings, reviewed and synthesized findings, and evaluated the quality of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. The Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool was used to evaluate bias of individual studies. We reported findings as prescribed by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. ResultsOf the 3007 records screened, five met inclusion criteria. The inter-rater agreement for inclusion/exclusion was high (κ = 0.87). One study addressed patient safety outcomes. Four studies assessed the impact of banking sleep on performance, five assessed measures of acute fatigue, and three evaluated banking sleep on indicators of health. All five studies presented a very serious risk of bias and the quality of evidence was very low. Given these caveats, the findings, in aggregate, support banking sleep as a strategy to improve indicators of performance and acute fatigue. ConclusionsThis systematic review identifies gaps in research of shift workers on the efficacy of banking sleep as a fatigue risk management strategy. The available evidence supports banking sleep prior to shiftwork as a strategy for improved patient safety, performance, and reducing acute fatigue.