Abstract

This study tests the influence of environmental risks associated with floods, hurricanes, and hazardous material releases on human migration behavior. With close attention to a function of environmental risk factors, socio-demographic attributes, hazard risk and locational attributes were measured and correlated to the standardized number of recent arrivals and long term residents at the census tract level. Two groups (i.e., recent arrivals and long-term residents) were created to compare their moving behavior. The results indicate that flood risk showed little relationship to either recent arrivals or long-term residents. These results are consistent with past research which suggests that people tend to ignore their vulnerability to natural hazards. However, both groups had negative relationships to the risk from hurricanes and hazardous material releases. This counter-intuitive result suggests that other factors, such as proximity to employment opportunities or property tax advantages, need to be examined. In particular, the recent arrivals were negatively related to chemical risk while long-term residents were positively related to chemical risks, indicating that people that just arrived and old residents are somewhat different in perceiving environmental risks. In addition, the results of this study suggest that people are objective about environmental risks in selecting their habitat. However, once the habitat is settled, people’s perception of the risks may be interfered or reduced by other factors.

Highlights

  • IntroductionAs many urban areas of the United States have increased development in hazard prone areas, losses of property from natural and technological disasters have been rising, even though fatality rates have been falling due to advanced its early warning systems [2] [3]

  • The recent arrivals were negatively related to chemical risk while long-term residents were positively related to chemical risks, indicating that people that just arrived and old residents are somewhat different in perceiving environmental risks

  • Planners and policy makers are provided with information on how their local residents adjust their behaviors toward a housing issue in relation to environmental risks, and on how different groups of residents respond to the issue in terms of social/economic/demographic characteristics

Read more

Summary

Introduction

As many urban areas of the United States have increased development in hazard prone areas, losses of property from natural and technological disasters have been rising, even though fatality rates have been falling due to advanced its early warning systems [2] [3]. Conrad and his colleague [4] estimate average annual federal expenditure for disaster relief and preparedness at $7 billion. This increased vulnerability raises questions about people’s perceptions of, and response to, these environmental hazards

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call