Abstract
Soil microbes have important effects on the interactions of plants with their environment, by promoting plant growth, inducing resistance to pests or by conferring tolerance to abiotic stress. However, their effects are variable and the factors responsible for this variation are mainly unknown. Our aim was to assess how drought stress modifies the effect of the nonpathogenic rhizobacterium Pseudomonas simiae WCS417r on plant growth and resistance against the generalist leaf-chewing caterpillar Mamestra brassicae. We studied Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 plants, as well as mutants altered in the biosynthesis of the phytohormones jasmonic acid (JA) and abscisic acid (ABA). Caterpillars did not prefer rhizobacteria-treated plants, independently of drought stress. Rhizobacteria colonization had a variable effect on caterpillar performance, which ranged from positive in one experiment to neutral in a second one. Drought had a consistent negative effect on herbivore performance; however, it did not modify the effect of rhizobacteria on herbivore performance. The effect of drought on herbivore performance was JA-mediated (confirmed with the use of the dde2-2 mutant), but it was still present in the ABA-deficient mutant aba2-1. Plant biomass was reduced by both drought and herbivory but it was enhanced by rhizobacterial colonization. Pseudomonas simiae WCS417r is able to promote plant growth even when plants are suffering herbivory. Nevertheless, the microbial effect on the herbivore is variable, independently of drought stress. To get the best possible outcome from the rhizobacteria-plant mutualism it is important to understand which other factors may be responsible for its context-dependency.
Highlights
In nature, plants are involved in negative interactions with e.g. pathogens and herbivorous insects, and in positiveC 2017 The Authors
When plants were not colonized by rhizobacteria, caterpillars preferred control over drought-stressed plants (t11 = 0.034)
When plants were treated with rhizobacteria, caterpillars showed no preference (t19 = 0.093)
Summary
Plants are involved in negative interactions with e.g. pathogens and herbivorous insects, and in positiveC 2017 The Authors. The effect of root-associated microbes on herbivorous insects varies from positive (D’Alessandro et al, 2014; Megali et al, 2014) to negative (van Oosten et al, 2008; Pangesti et al, 2016a; Zebelo et al, 2016) and to date we do not fully understand the factors responsible for this variation. Biotic factors such as feeding guild and degree of specialization of the insects have been shown to affect the outcome of plant–microbe interactions. Whether drought influences the plant-mediated effects of microbes on herbivores is not yet known and the underlying mechanisms have not been studied
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
