Abstract

With the rising interest in digestate use as a fertilizer on permanent cultures, there is a need to examine its effects on food and feed quality. This study is focused on the use of digestate in grassland fertilization and its effects on nutritive value parameters such as mycotoxin contamination (deoxynivalenol, aflatoxin, and T-2 toxin) and nutrient content (crude protein, crude fat, crude fiber, ash, nitrogen-free extract, digestibility of organic matter, acid detergent fiber, and ash-free neutral detergent fiber). The experiment was carried out in the Czech Republic, and the effects of fertilization regime, year, and harvest date (summer and fall cuts) on nutritive value were observed. An effect of the year on DON, AFB1, and T-2 contamination levels was observed. An effect of the harvest or fertilization regime on mycotoxin contamination was not observed. Significant differences were observed in the content of all nutrients, except ash, depending on the year. Differences were found only in the case of ADF levels, depending on the harvest date, as well; however, no differences were found between fertilization regimes. Our findings suggest that digestate does not negatively affect fodder in terms of nutritive value nor safety.

Highlights

  • Permanent grasslands are frequently underutilized by farmers, abandoned, or managed extensively as a fodder source, due to their special management systems, often difficult accessibility, and low economic profitability [1]

  • DON levels were not correlated to any level of nutrition; there was no dependency of DON concentration on the biomass or concentrations of crude protein (CP), crude fat (CFAT), crude fiber (CF), ash, nitrogen-free extract (NFE), digestibility of organic matter (DOM), acid detergent fiber (ADF), or ash-free neutral detergent fiber (aNDF)

  • A strong correlation was found between aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) levels and levels of CP, CF, ash, DOM, ADF, and aNDF

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Permanent grasslands are frequently underutilized by farmers, abandoned, or managed extensively as a fodder source, due to their special management systems (such as protected landscape areas), often difficult accessibility (steeply sloped terrain), and low economic profitability [1]. Permanent grasslands are agricultural sources that have the attributes of quite stable natural biocenosis, spreading on nearly 1 mil. Ha in 2020 in the Czech Republic alone [2]. The nutritive value of forage on extensively managed sites is not high. May fertilization contribute to improving forage nutritive value? The annual forage production from grasslands in the Czech Republic is 0.5–15 t/ha of dry matter, depending on the environment. A low yield is often caused by insufficient fertilization of stands [5]. As a byproduct of anaerobic digestion, comprises small amounts of ammonia, sulphate, and trace elements, which makes digestate a notable source of nutrients essential for biomass production [6,7,8]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call