Does D2 plus Para-Aortic Nodal Dissection surgery offer a better survival outcome compared to D2 surgery only for gastric cancer consistently? A definite result based on a hospital population of nearly two decades

Abstract

Curative resection is the treatment of choice for gastric cancer. Although it has been concluded that D2 lymphadenectomy plus para-aortic nodal dissection does not improve survival rate in curable gastric cancer, it is unclear whether D2 plus para-aortic nodal dissection has a benefit in some groups of patients. We conducted a retrospective study in our hospital, in which we compared D2 with D2 plus para-aortic nodal dissection lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer in subgroups of each clinical characteristic in terms of long-term survival after surgery. We selected 1792 patients who had undergone the treatment with curative intent between 1990 and 2007, 1344 in the D2 group and 448 in the D2 plus para-aortic nodal dissection group. Each procedure was verified by pathological analyses. The primary end points were 5-year overall survival. Median follow-up periods were 50 months for patients assigned to D2 group and 54 months for patients assigned to D2 plus para-aortic nodal dissection group. Overall 5-year survival was not significantly higher in patients assigned to D2 plus para-aortic nodal dissection surgery compared to those assigned to D2 surgery (31.2% (95% confidence interval: 19.8%-42.6%) vs 26.6% (95% confidence interval: 20.3%-32.9%); log-rank p = 0.433). D2 plus para-aortic nodal dissection surgery should only be used for curable gastric cancer of T3-4 and N2 stage and should not be used for T1 disease and total gastrectomy.