Abstract

This correspondence concerns a recent publication in Immunity by Hickman et al.1 who analyzed the effect of Cxcr3 knockout on migration of CD8+ T cells towards and within vaccinia virus-infected mouse ears. They found that Cxcr3 knockout had no effect on CD8+ T cell migration into the infected ears, a relatively mild effect on virus clearance, and an effect on the contact of CD8+ T cells with virus-infected cells. Curiously, despite having these basically sound and interesting data, Hickman et al. exaggerated the effect on virus clearance (“dramatically impaired virus clearance”) and focused their conclusions on assumed differences in migration towards infected cells (“CXCR3 chemokine receptor enables local CD8+ T cell migration”) rather than on better proven differences in binding to infected cells. I believe that from the data presented by Hickman et al. on the effect of Cxcr3 knockout a migration effect independent from the binding effect cannot be concluded beyond discussion. The fact that CXCR3 is a chemokine receptor, and that most researchers consequently expect a chemokine-gradient-dependent migration effect of the Cxcr3 knockout mutation, increases the risk of misleading readers when approached through the Hickman et al. narrative. The here-initiated discussion of their article may help to avoid such a misleading.

Highlights

  • At the request of the author(s), this article is no longer under peer review

  • The recombinant vaccinia viruses used were VV-NP-eGFP and VV-NP-S-eGFP, of which only the latter contains the CD8+ T cell determinant peptide sequence SIINFEKL which can be recognized in the MHC context of this system by the T cell receptor transgenically expressed in OT-I mice

  • For reasons that are not supported by the data, in their narrative Hickman et al exaggerated the effect of the Cxcr[3] knockout on viral clearance, and speculated as a major model of explanation that Cxcr[3] knockout reduced penetration of CD8+ cells into infected cell areas

Read more

Summary

Introduction

At the request of the author(s), this article is no longer under peer review. What does this mean?. Using a number of techniques, Hickman et al assayed the migration of CD8+ T cells into the infected ears, including into dense areas of infected monocytes, and to the draining lymph nodes.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.