Abstract
BackgroundThe effect of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on cardiac function improvement remains controversial. Furthermore, recent evidence suggests that improvement in cardiac function after CABG does not improve life expectancy. This study aimed to examine whether CABG improved cardiac function and how this improvement influenced all-cause mortality and to compare patient prognosis according to preoperative cardiac function. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of ≤35% who underwent CABG between January 1994 and December 2022. We compared patients with and without cardiac function improvement, defined as an increase in LVEF of ≥10%, to identify associated factors and assess the impact on all-cause mortality. We also compared outcomes according to the degree of preoperative LV dysfunction. ResultsAmong the 166 patients included, 102 and 64 had a preoperative LVEF of 25%-35% and ≤25%, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 79.9 ± 72.3 months. We observed significant LVEF improvement, from 28% (range, 23.3%-35%) preoperatively to 39% (range, 31%-46%) at 13.1 months postoperatively. The 7-year survival rates were similar in the ejection fraction ≤25% and 25%-35% groups (80.2% vs 73.8%, P = .11). However, patients with an LVEF improvement of ≥10% exhibited a markedly better prognosis than those without LVEF improvement at 7 years (85.9% vs 63.5%, P=.001). ConclusionsOur findings suggest that CABG may enhance cardiac function in more than half of patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, with a correlation to improved all-cause mortality. Moreover, LVEF improvement after CABG is associated with an improved prognosis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.