Abstract
The publication of an article by Zeki and his colleagues (1993) suggesting that the motion in the rings of Enigma is the consequence of cortical activity, and more specifically of area V5, has resulted in a debate between Professor Zeki and Professor Gregory, who believes instead that the motion is the result either of accommodative changes in the lens or of micromovements of the eyes. As an artist, I thought it interesting to contribute to that debate raised by the publication of Zeki9s paper and relate the steps that led me to the execution of Enigma.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
