Abstract

The risk of bacteremia secondary to high pressure lavage of contaminated wounds was assessed. Twenty canines were divided randomly into four treatment groups. A 10-cm incision was made over the left shoulder of each dog. The deltoideus muscle was disrupted and traumatized. Groups A and B (n = 8) had wound contamination with 1.4 x 10(9) Staphylococcus aureus followed 75 minutes later by high pressure lavage or bulb syringe irrigation, respectively. Groups C and D (n = 2) had no contamination, followed by the same treatment. Bacterial counts were obtained before and after wound irrigation. Blood cultures were obtained before, during, and 15 minutes after irrigation. Positive control cultures were obtained during injection of bacteria into the antecubital vein. A detectable bacteremia did not occur during or after high pressure lavage or bulb syringe irrigation of acute contaminated wounds but did occur in 18 of 20 positive controls. Bacterial levels were reduced by an average of 70% +/- 10% by high pressure lavage and 44% +/- 50% by bulb irrigation. Reduction of wound bacteria was achieved more consistently with high pressure lavage than with bulb syringe irrigation.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.