Does apical prolapse in addition to early stage anterior prolapse have any effect on lower urinary tract symptoms?

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate whether apical prolapse in addition to early-stage anterior prolapse has any effect on lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). MethodsPatients with early-stage pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were retrospectively analyzed at the urogynecology unit of a tertiary referral center. Cases with posterior POP were excluded, and the remaining women were distributed across four main groups: (1) no determinable anterior and/or apical POP (control); (2) isolated anterior POP; (3) anterior + apical POP; and (4) isolated apical POP. Each LUTS symptom in these groups was recorded. Women with isolated anterior POP and women with anterior + apical POP were then compared to define the additional effects of apical prolapse on LUTS. In order to asses; symptoms of urgency, urinary incontinence, stress urinary incontinence, frequency, abnormal emptying, hesitancy, interrupted stream, nocturia, post-micturition dribble, and dysuria were noted and Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7), and domains of Urinary Distress Inventory (UDI-6) were compared between the groups. ResultsOf the 225 patients, 66 were excluded from the analysis due to accompanying posterior compartment defect. There was no statistically significant difference for age, systemic disease history, or smoking status between the groups (p > 0.05). However, history of traumatic vaginal delivery was significantly lower in the control group than in the other groups (p = 0.039). The prevalence of hesitancy and interrupted stream were found to be significantly higher in the anterior + apical POP group than in the isolated POP group (p<0.05). Obstructive subscale of the Urinary Distress Inventory was higher both in the isolated anterior POP and anterior + apical POP groups than the control group (p<0.05). ConclusionThe current study demonstrates that even minimal loss of apical support accompanying anterior prolapse exacerbates LUTS.