Abstract
This article examines the unemployment consequences of an employment protection law (EPL) on the basis of OECD EPL indicators for 23 OECD countries over the period 1990–2008. Using the alternative dynamic panel data models and panel causality tests, it examines the validity of the neo-liberal argument that strictness of employment protection hurts labour through increased long-term and youth unemployment rates. Although it finds little empirical basis for this orthodox standpoint, the article observes that the unemployment problem dampens aggregate production, which in turn aggravates the long-term unemployment problem. The policy prescription suggested is employment generation by other means than neo-liberal ‘hire and fire’ labour regulations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.