Abstract

There is much discussion about usefulness of book-tax differences in evaluating firm performance. This study contributes to this discussion assessing the information content of estimated and actual taxable income for Finnish corporate data from 2012-2013. The findings for year 2012 show that book income has higher explanation power of stock returns than other income concepts. However, estimated taxable income does not bring any incremental explanatory power to book income whereas actual taxable income contains more relative and also incremental information. The findings show that the explanation power of estimated taxable income in high earnings quality firms is comparable with that of book income but insignificant in low earnings quality firms. On the contrary, the explanation power of actual taxable income is lower in high earnings quality firms and higher in low earnings quality firms. For high earnings quality firms, neither of the taxable income concepts brings incremental information to book income. For low earnings quality firms, estimated taxable income does not bring any incremental information to book income whereas actual taxable income does. For these firms, actual taxable income brings significant incremental information also to estimated taxable income. For year 2013, anticipated significant tax rate reduction largely mitigated the relevant relationships between returns and income concepts.

Highlights

  • Empirical studies on taxation suggest that book-tax differences are useful measures in evaluating firm performance (Hanlon, 2005; Lev & Nissim, 2004; Ayers, Jiang & Laplante, 2009; Hanlon & Heitzman, 2010). Shevlin (2002) and Hanlon, Laplante & Shevlin (2005) report that book income explains annual stock returns better than estimated taxable income that is calculated using financial statement disclosures

  • Taxable income brings incremental explanatory power to book income indicating that taxable income summarizes information reflected in stock returns that is not captured by book income

  • The results indicate that estimated taxable income (ETI) does not contain any incremental explanation power to pre-tax book income (PTBI) in either year

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Empirical studies on taxation suggest that book-tax differences are useful measures in evaluating firm performance (Hanlon, 2005; Lev & Nissim, 2004; Ayers, Jiang & Laplante, 2009; Hanlon & Heitzman, 2010). Shevlin (2002) and Hanlon, Laplante & Shevlin (2005) report that book income explains annual stock returns better than estimated taxable income that is calculated using financial statement disclosures. Shevlin (2002) and Hanlon, Laplante & Shevlin (2005) report that book income explains annual stock returns better than estimated taxable income that is calculated using financial statement disclosures. Empirical studies on taxation suggest that book-tax differences are useful measures in evaluating firm performance (Hanlon, 2005; Lev & Nissim, 2004; Ayers, Jiang & Laplante, 2009; Hanlon & Heitzman, 2010). There is very little research on the information content of actual taxable income due to the difficult access to corporate tax information that is almost always not public. The objective of this research is to contribute to current taxation research assessing the information content of both estimated and actual taxable income using Finnish corporate data from 2011-2013

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call