Abstract

Relative financial constraints affect firms’ aggressiveness in industry competition. Using eight alternative proxies for financial constraints, we find that consistent with the deep pocket theory, in the three years following an acquisition, the unconstrained rivals tend to become follow-up acquirers while the constrained rivals are more likely to get acquired. The effect is more pronounced in M&A-intensive industries, among the rivals with more growth opportunities and lower operating efficiency. Also, the rivals would become worse off if they do not make follow-up acquisitions. Overall, these findings indicate that considering firms’ relative financial constraints can be an alternative approach to detecting anticompetitive acquisitions.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.