Abstract

In 2003, Guth posed the following question in a KITP seminar in UCSB. Namely “Even if there exist 101000 vacuum states produced by String theory, does inflation produce overwhelmingly one preferred type of vacuum states over the other possible types of vacuum states”? This document tries to answer how a preferred vacuum state could be produced, and by what sort of process. We construct a di quark condensate leading to a cosmological constant in line with known physical observations. We use a phase transition bridge from a tilted washboard potential to the chaotic inflationary model pioneered by Guth which is congruent with the slow roll criteria. This permits criteria for initiation of graviton production from a domain wall formed after a transition to a chaotic inflationary potential. It also permits investigation of if or not axion wall contributions to inflation are necessary. If we reject an explicit axion mass drop off to infinitesimal values at high temperatures, we may use the Bogomolnyi inequality to rescale and reset initial conditions for the chaotic inflationary potential. Then the Randall-Sundrum brane world effective potential delineates the end of the dominant role of di quarks, and the beginning of inflation. And perhaps answers Freeman Dysons contention that Graviton production is unlikely given present astrophysical constraints upon detector systems. We end this with a description in the last appendix entry, Appendix VI, as to why, given the emphasis upon di quarks, as to the usefulness of using times before Planck time interval as to modeling our physical system and its importance as to emergent field structures used for cosmological modeling.

Highlights

  • It is well known through conventional calculations via QCD that there is a huge disconnection between what is calculated for a cosmological constant [1], and the de facto observed phenomenological data which purports to support a cosmological constant far lower in magnitude than what is presumed to be an artifact of vacuum polarization [2]

  • To begin we present using the paper written by Leach et al on conditions from a FRW brane [28] in early universe cosmology, assuming that the cosmological constant input is formed as a result of the immediate consequences of the phase transition indicated in Equation (13) above

  • What we have formulated so far in this paper is a start toward analyzing initial conditions permitting a cosmological constant without the huge 10120 magnitude overshoot of current QCD vacuum state values which are reported all over the literature without using his cyclic universe model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is well known through conventional calculations via QCD that there is a huge disconnection between what is calculated for a cosmological constant [1], and the de facto observed phenomenological data which purports to support a cosmological constant far lower in magnitude than what is presumed to be an artifact of vacuum polarization [2]. The 5th dimension of the Randall-Sundrum brane world is of the genre [28], for −π ≤ θ ≤ π x5 ≡ R ⋅θ (10) This lead to an additional embedding structure for typical GR fields, assuming as one may write up a scalar potential “field” with φ0 ( x) real valued, and the rest of it complex valued as [28]: WITH c.c. REFERRING. This scalar field makes its way to an action integral structure which will be discussed later on, which Sundrum used to forming an effective potential Our claim in this analysis can be used as a way of either embedding a Bogomolyni inequality, perhaps up to five dimensions [22], or a straight forward reduction in axion mass due to a rise in temperature [29] helped reduced effective potential in this structure, with the magnitude of the Sundrum potential forming an initial condition for the second potential of the following phase transition. This is for a di quark pair along the lines given when looking at the first potential system, which is a take off upon Zhitinisky’s color super conductor model [11]

Summarizing Different Approaches to Forming a Cosmological Constant
14. Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.