Abstract

In his by now classic contribution to biology, What is Life?, Schrodinger underlined the shortcomings of contemporary physics when questions of biological systems are at stake. He observed that “living matter, while not eluding the ‘laws of physics’ as established up to date, is likely to involve ‘other laws of physics’ hitherto unknown” (Schrodinger, 1969, p. 73). That was in 1944. The physics known at that time included all the foundations of modern linear physics, that is, quantum mechanics. Since then, important developments in understanding many-body, nonlinear and out of equilibrium systems have become established parts of the physics framework and, as a matter of fact, currently draw much of the attention of the physics community. This new framework for the study of complex phenomena seems to offer a convenient departure point for thinking about biological phenomena. However, this very approach of great sophistication leads us back to the conflict which Schrodinger already identified: What is life? may not be answered within the existing framework which was conceived of in an attempt to explain the inanimate world (Braun and Hon, 1996).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.