Does a history of violent offending impact treatment response for comorbid PTSD and substance use disorders? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Does a history of violent offending impact treatment response for comorbid PTSD and substance use disorders? A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial
- # Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
- # Substance Use Disorder
- # Cognitive Behavioral Treatments For Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
- # Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Severity
- # Violent Offending
- # Substance Use
- # Treatment Of Substance Use Disorder
- # Relapse Prevention
- # Histories Of Perpetration
- # Prolonged Exposure
- Abstract
- 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2018.12.155
- Feb 1, 2019
- Psychoneuroendocrinology
Toxic stress in adolescence: A person-centered approach
- Research Article
36
- 10.1037/ccp0000345
- Oct 1, 2018
- Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
To advance understanding of the effectiveness of evidence-based treatments for comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD), research must provide a more nuanced picture of how substance use affects change in PTSD symptoms over the course of treatments and whether prolonged exposure techniques can be efficacious during active substance use. A data set that included patients with PTSD/subthreshold-PTSD and SUD treated with an exposure-based intervention provided an opportunity to conduct a secondary analysis to test how patients' substance use impacted PTSD change over treatment. We applied growth models to week-to-week PTSD symptom and substance use changes during treatment and follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of two cognitive-behavioral treatments for PTSD and SUD: Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and SUD Using Prolonged Exposure (COPE) and Relapse Prevention Therapy (RPT). Cross-lagged analyses were used to determine whether prior week substance use impacted subsequent PTSD symptom severity. Both treatments evidenced significant reductions in PTSD symptom severity. In the context of continued substance use, results suggest that individuals still benefit from exposure-based treatment. Results provide evidence that RPT and COPE both led to significant reductions in PTSD, providing further support that exposure-based techniques tailored for SUD can be conducted without jeopardizing PTSD or SUD outcomes. Implications for clinical decision making around treatment selection are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved).
- Research Article
61
- 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.02.005
- Feb 25, 2011
- Addictive Behaviors
Hurt people who hurt people: Violence amongst individuals with comorbid substance use disorder and post traumatic stress disorder
- Research Article
99
- 10.1159/000462977
- May 1, 2017
- Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
Background: To test whether an integrated prolonged exposure (PE) approach could address posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms effectively in individuals with co-occurring substance use disorders (SUD), we compared concurrent treatment of PTSD and SUD using PE (COPE) to relapse prevention therapy (RPT) for SUD and an active monitoring control group (AMCG). Methods: We conducted a randomized 12-week trial with participants (n = 110; 64% males; 59% African Americans) who met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition, text revision criteria for full or subthreshold PTSD and SUD. Participants were randomly assigned to COPE (n = 39), RPT (n = 43), or AMCG (n = 28). Results: At the end-of-treatment, COPE and RPT demonstrated greater reduction in PTSD symptom severity relative to AMCG (COPE-AMCG = -34.06, p < 0.001; RPT-AMCG = -22.58, p = 0.002). Although the difference between COPE and RPT was not significant in the complete sample, the subset of participants with full (vs. subthreshold) PTSD demonstrated significantly greater reduction of PTSD severity in COPE relative to RPT. Both treatments were superior to AMCG in reducing the days of primary substance use (COPE-AMCG = -0.97, p = 0.01; RPT-AMCG = -2.07, p < 0.001). Relative to COPE, RPT showed significantly more improvement in SUD outcome at end-of-treatment (RPT-COPE = -1.10, p = 0.047). At 3-month follow-up, COPE and RPT maintained their treatment gains and were not significantly different in PTSD severity or days of primary substance use. Conclusion: COPE and RPT reduced PTSD and SUD severity in participants with PTSD + SUD. Findings suggest that among those with full PTSD, COPE improves PTSD symptoms more than a SUD-only treatment. The use of PE for PTSD was associated with significant decreases in PTSD symptoms without worsening of substance use.
- Research Article
6
- 10.1016/j.ejtd.2017.06.001
- Jun 13, 2017
- European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation
Dissociation and under-regulation of affect in patients with posttraumatic stress disorder with and without a co-morbid substance use disorder
- Research Article
19
- 10.3390/jcm5110101
- Nov 15, 2016
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
This paper examines factors associated with change in PTSD symptom severity among individuals randomised to receive an integrated exposure-based psychotherapy for PTSD and substance dependence–Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and Substance Use Disorders Using Prolonged Exposure (COPE). Outcomes examined include change in PTSD symptom severity as measured by the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS), and the reliability and clinical significance of change in PTSD symptom severity. Factors examined include patient baseline characteristics, treatment characteristics, and events over follow-up. The mean difference in CAPS score was 38.24 (SE 4.81). Approximately half (49.1%) demonstrated a reliable and clinically significant improvement in PTSD symptom severity. No one was classified as having demonstrated clinically significant worsening of symptoms. Three independent predictors of reductions in PTSD symptom severity were identified: baseline PTSD symptom severity (β 0.77, SE 0.23, p = 0.001), number of traumas experienced prior to baseline (β −0.30, SE 0.15, p = 0.049), and number of sessions attended (β 2.05, SE 0.87, p = 0.024). The present study provides further evidence regarding the safety of the COPE treatment and factors associated with improvement in PTSD symptom severity. The identification of only a small number of predictors of the outcome points to the broad applicability of the COPE treatment to PTSD and substance use disorder (SUD) patients.
- Research Article
197
- 10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.11.032
- Nov 27, 2018
- Addictive Behaviors
Concurrent treatment of substance use disorders and PTSD using prolonged exposure: A randomized clinical trial in military veterans
- Research Article
12
- 10.1080/10826084.2020.1797805
- Aug 22, 2020
- Substance Use & Misuse
Objective A history of childhood abuse and neglect (CAN) is significantly associated with psychopathologies in adulthood, including comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (SUD). Difficulties in emotion regulation (ER) might influence the association between CAN and PTSD. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between CAN and PTSD symptom severity in women with SUD and to investigate the mediating role of general difficulties in ER and its specific dimensions. Method: We examined 320 women, with a current diagnosis of at least subsyndromal PTSD and SUD, using self-report measures of CAN, PTSD symptom severity, and ER difficulties. We conducted both simple and multiple bootstrapping-enhanced mediation analysis to investigate whether general difficulties in ER and its specific dimensions mediate the relationship between CAN and PTSD symptom severity. Results: General difficulties in ER mediated the association between CAN and PTSD symptom severity. CAN significantly predicted adult PTSD symptom severity, directly and indirectly, through ER difficulties. Difficulties engaging in goal directed behavior when distressed was the only ER dimension, which mediated the effect of CAN on PTSD symptoms. Conclusions: Our results suggest that difficulties in ER and specifically difficulties engaging in goal directed behavior when distressed might constitute an influential factor in the relationship between CAN and PTSD symptom severity in a sample of SUD patients, and highlight the importance of targeting ER as a potential treatment focus for patients with comorbid PTSD and SUD.
- Research Article
2
- 10.1111/add.70097
- May 29, 2025
- Addiction (Abingdon, England)
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder (SUD) are highly co-occurring and evidence for the optimal ways of treating PTSD in SUD patients is mixed. Our aim was to compare three different PTSD treatments, each added simultaneously to SUD treatment, with SUD treatment alone in patients with co-occurring SUD-PTSD. These PTSD treatments were: Prolonged Exposure (PE), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) and Imagery Rescripting (ImRs). A single-blind 4-arm randomized controlled trial with follow-up at 3months. Two addiction treatment centers in the Netherlands, providing intra- and extramural care. 209 patients with SUD and co-morbid PTSD were included [mean age 37.5 (standard deviation, SD = 11.99), female sex = 46.4%, mean Clinically Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) score = 37.35 (SD = 9.28)]. Participants were randomized to either simultaneous SUD + PE (n = 53), SUD + EMDR (n = 50), SUD + ImRs (n = 55) or to SUD treatment only (n = 51), with the active PTSD treatments consisting of 12 sessions each within 3months. Standard protocols were used. The primary outcome was clinician-administered PTSD symptom severity as measured by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (CAPS-5) at 3month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included loss of PTSD diagnosis, full remission of PSTD and SUD-severity, also recorded at 3months. Compared with SUD only, the mean differences in CAPS-5 score were B = -5.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 10.88, 0.05, P = 0.052] for SUD + PE, B = -7.97 (95% CI = -13.57, -2.37, P = 0.006) for SUD + EMDR and B = -10.03 (95% CI = -15.29, -4.77, P < 0.001) for SUD + ImRs. When adjusted for baseline covariates, mean differences were B = -5.81 (95% CI = -11.48, -0.15, P = 0.044) for SUD + PE, B = -8.85 (95% CI = -14.60, -3.10, P = 0.003) for SUD + EMDR and B = -10.75 (95% CI = -15.94, -5.56, P = <0.001) for SUD + ImRs. No between-group differences in SUD outcomes were found. Among people with co-occurring substance use disorder (SUD) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), trauma-focused PTSD treatment as add-on to SUD treatment appears to be effective in decreasing PTSD severity compared with manualized SUD only treatment and does not appear to increase SUD severity.
- Research Article
10
- 10.1080/15332640.2020.1836699
- Oct 26, 2020
- Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse
Objective Substance use disorders (SUD) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) frequently co-occur. While previous research has examined ethnoracial differences among individuals with either SUD or PTSD, little research to date has focused on individuals with co-occurring SUD/PTSD. The current study addresses this gap in the literature. Method Participants were 79 military veterans (91% male; 38% African American [AA] and 62% White) with current SUD/PTSD who were randomized to receive Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and Substance Use Disorders using Prolonged Exposure (COPE) or Relapse Prevention (RP). Primary outcomes included substance use and self-reported and clinician-rated PTSD symptoms. Results At baseline, AA participants were significantly older, reported greater substance and alcohol use, and tended to report higher PTSD severity than White participants. AA participants evidenced greater decreases in substance and alcohol use during treatment, but greater increases in substance and alcohol use during follow-up as compared to White participants. All participants decreased alcohol consumption during treatment; however, AA participants in the COPE condition and White participants in the RP condition evidenced the steepest decreases in average number of drinks per drinking day (DDD) during treatment. Additionally, White participants receiving RP reported greater increases in DDD during follow-up compared to AA participants. Conclusion Overall, integrated treatment for co-occurring SUD/PTSD was effective for both AA and White participants; however, some important differences emerged by ethnoracial group. Findings suggest that greater attention to race and ethnicity is warranted to better understand the needs of diverse patients with SUD/PTSD and to optimize treatment outcomes.
- Research Article
5
- 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21087
- Jul 15, 2025
- JAMA Network Open
Trauma-focused treatments are effective for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) but are rarely offered to patients with comorbid substance use disorder. Research suggests gender-based differences in prevalence and treatment needs for these patients, but treatment trials have mainly included men. To evaluate whether integrated trauma-focused psychological treatment (ie, integrated treatment) leads to greater reduction in PTSD symptom severity and weekly alcohol use than usual treatment (ie, relapse prevention) for alcohol use disorder (AUD) in women. This randomized clinical trial was conducted at 3 outpatient addiction services in Sweden. Data were collected from 2016 to 2021, and participants were followed up for 9 months after treatment initiation. Data were analyzed from October 2024 to April 2025. Participants were women older than 18 years with current PTSD and moderate-to-severe AUD diagnoses meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria. Participants were randomly assigned to either the integrated treatment or relapse prevention arm. Intention-to-treat analyses were carried out using linear mixed models. Twelve sessions, typically weekly, of integrated treatment (ie, Concurrent Treatment of PTSD and Substance Use Disorders Using Prolonged Exposure [COPE]) or relapse prevention were delivered by trained and experienced staff (including registered nurses, licensed psychologists, and social workers). Prespecified co-primary outcomes were PTSD symptom severity (assessed by blinded raters using Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 [CAPS-5]) and weekly alcohol use (self-assessed using Timeline Followback) from baseline to the 9-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included self-reported PTSD symptom severity, clinician-rated PTSD remission, and an objective biomarker of alcohol use (phosphatidylethanol level). Ninety women (mean [SD] age, 44.7 [12.5] years) were included and randomly assigned to integrated treatment (n = 45) or relapse prevention (n = 45). In both arms, PTSD symptom severity decreased from baseline to 9-month follow-up (mean CAPS-5 score for integrated treatment: 37.40 [95% CI, 33.84-40.96] to 13.18 [95% CI, 8.95-17.41]; relapse prevention: 39.09 [95% CI, 35.53-42.65] to 23.68 [95% CI, 19.47-27.88]), with a significantly greater decrease in the integrated treatment arm than the relapse prevention arm (treatment-by-time interaction: F4,155 = 3.0; P = .02). Self-reported alcohol use decreased significantly over time (F14,581 = 3.0; P < .001) in both arms (integrated treatment: 144.41 [95% CI, 104.66-184.15] g/week to 92.65 [95% CI, 48.81-136.48] g/week; relapse prevention: 133.45 [95% CI, 93.71-173.19] g/week to 77.80 [95% CI, 31.65-123.95] g/week), but there was no detectable difference between treatments. In this trial of integrated treatment vs relapse prevention, integrated treatment led to a greater reduction in PTSD symptom severity and no detectable difference in alcohol use decrease compared with relapse prevention. These results support that integrated treatment can safely and effectively treat PTSD in women with AUD and ongoing alcohol use. ISRCTN.org Identifier: ISRCTN61391164.
- Research Article
19
- 10.3390/jcm6020014
- Feb 7, 2017
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
Background: Research has demonstrated a strong link between trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorders (SUDs) in general and cannabis use disorders in particular. Yet, few studies have examined the impact of cannabis use on treatment outcomes for individuals with co-occurring PTSD and SUDs. Methods: Participants were 136 individuals who received cognitive-behavioral therapies for co-occurring PTSD and SUD. Multivariate regressions were utilized to examine the associations between baseline cannabis use and end-of-treatment outcomes. Multilevel linear growth models were fit to the data to examine the cross-lagged associations between weekly cannabis use and weekly PTSD symptom severity and primary substance use during treatment. Results: There were no significant positive nor negative associations between baseline cannabis use and end-of-treatment PTSD symptom severity and days of primary substance use. Cross-lagged models revealed that as cannabis use increased, subsequent primary substance use decreased and vice versa. Moreover, results revealed a crossover lagged effect, whereby higher cannabis use was associated with greater PTSD symptom severity early in treatment, but lower weekly PTSD symptom severity later in treatment. Conclusion: Cannabis use was not associated with adverse outcomes in end-of-treatment PTSD and primary substance use, suggesting independent pathways of change. The theoretical and clinical implications of the reciprocal associations between weekly cannabis use and subsequent PTSD and primary substance use symptoms during treatment are discussed.
- Research Article
6
- 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106876
- Aug 18, 2022
- Contemporary clinical trials
Comparative effectiveness of trauma-focused and non-trauma-focused psychotherapy for PTSD among veterans with comorbid substance use disorders: Protocol & rationale for a randomized clinical trial
- Research Article
23
- 10.1016/j.jsat.2020.01.012
- Jan 22, 2020
- Journal of substance abuse treatment
The impact of trauma characteristics on post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorder outcomes across integrated and substance use treatments
- Research Article
38
- 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.04.005
- Apr 4, 2017
- Addictive Behaviors
Integrated, exposure-based treatment for PTSD and comorbid substance use disorders: Predictors of treatment dropout