Abstract

BackgroundThere are no effective treatments for diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG); median survival is 11.2 months. Bevacizumab has the potential to improve quality of life (QOL) and survival in DIPG but has never been evaluated systematically. The aim of this review was to assess Bevacizumab’s role in the treatment of DIPG.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for relevant studies using terms developed from alternatives for Bevacizumab and DIPG. One reviewer screened titles and abstracts, then two reviewers screened full texts. Data were extracted into tables and quality assessed using methodological index for non-randomized studies and JBI tools.ResultsSearching revealed 1001 papers; after deduplication 851 remained. After screening of titles and abstracts, then 28 full texts, 11 studies were included. Four studies reported a median overall survival longer than historical data, however, two found no significant impact of Bevacizumab. Five studies reported a radiological response in a proportion of participants and two reported no response. Three studies, evaluating clinical response, reported improvement in a proportion of patients. Three studies, evaluating QOL, reported stability or improvement. Four studies, evaluating steroid use, reported reductions in the proportion of patients receiving steroids. In radiation necrosis treatment, Bevacizumab led to clinical improvement in 6/12 patients in 2 studies and permitted a reduction in steroid use in most patients.ConclusionsInsufficient evidence means the role of Bevacizumab in the treatment of DIPG is unclear. However, Bevacizumab may be beneficial to some patients. The review highlights the need for further research in this area.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.