Abstract
In this chapter, we present a method for comparing tagging systems and patterns of disciplinary variation in corpora of student writing. We begin by highlighting the affordances of rhetorically and linguistically informed tagging systems by highlighting similarities and differences in each system’s analysis of the Michigan Corpus of Upper-Level Student Papers (MICUSP). Results confirm that both taggers produce statistically robust results in distinguishing disciplines across three dimensions and also highlight commonalities and differences that reflect the taggers’ respective theoretical orientations. Then, we present the results of a DocuScope-driven comparison of the British Academic Written English (BAWE) and MICUSP corpora and summarize topical and rhetorical patterns of disciplinary writing that seem fairly stable across national contexts. This chapter’s findings should prove useful to scholars interested in comparative methodologies of corpus analysis and rhetorical measures of disciplinary variation as well as those who work in or research writing in the disciplines.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
