Abstract
This case concerns the situation where the potentially novelty destroying disclosure was found on the internet. The Board had to consider what must be established for such a disclosure to form part of the state of the art. The Board decided to apply the same criteria and standard of proof as for prior use, or prior oral disclosure.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
More From: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
