Abstract
The Solomon Islands Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) was mandated to give special provisions for women, in accordance with global developments and expectations in transitional justice practice. Yet on the ground realities reveal that, though well-intentioned, efforts to achieve gender sensitivity and representation within an already imported mechanism are fraught with challenges. Meanwhile, scholars, policymakers, and practitioners continue to call for greater empirical research to understand how truth commissions are adopted, negotiated, contested, and transformed in the range of cultural contexts in which they are implemented, to contribute to a more informed and refined understanding for future practice. Drawing from research conducted with dozens of TRC staff and stakeholders, and the authors’ own experience of working for the Solomon Islands TRC, this chapter examines the friction of importing a globalised mechanism into a culturally embedded context; of balancing demands and aspirations for truth and reconciliation on the national level with localised realities; and the at-times clash between transitional justice discourse and local practices and kastoms in Solomon Islands. These challenges are illustrated with a closer examination and reflection of the difficulties and complexities of researching women’s experiences of the conflict, and of sexual violence in particular.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.