Abstract
International organizations are increasingly including Indigenous peoples' rights and the concept of Free, Prior and Informed Consent (FPIC) in their guidance documents, codes of conduct, and performance standards. Leading companies are adjusting their Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Social Performance frameworks to include a human rights based approach for engaging with Indigenous communities. Arguably, insufficient attention has been given to the normative, conceptual and practical differences between CSR and FPIC. The voluntary and instrumentalist character of CSR is not readily compatible with the basic tenets of human rights. While CSR is primarily applied by companies to reduce risk associated with societal opposition and reputational harm, FPIC is a mechanism to ensure respect for Indigenous rights relating to land, use of resources, and self-determination. CSR and FPIC thus serve different purposes, as reflected in their positions on issues such as: economic development; stakeholder management; the role of the corporation vis-à-vis the state; and the responsibilities and accountabilities of corporations.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Computer Law and Security Review: The International Journal of Technology and Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.