Doctrinal Debate on the Age of Contracting of Marital in Ibero-America

Abstract

In this article, I intend to identify, within the frame of the semiotic theories of C.S. Peirce and U. Eco, some indications that may help to shed light on a remarkable phenomenon of constitutional interpretation, namely the influence exerted, in the determination process of the constitutional provisions which attribute fundamental rights, by the set of beliefs, expectations, purposes, etc., sedimented within a socially oriented linguistic practice. Through this operation of analogical transposition, I aim to highlight how the identification of the theoretical-doctrinal backgrounds related to the complex of ethical-political conceptions incorporated by the constitutions is strongly influenced by various elements of an intra- and extra-textual nature. Furthermore, by placing the interpretative processes in a broader hermeneutic-semiotic framework that considers legal cases as sign functions, the text seeks to demonstrate in a relatively easy-to-understand manner that the theoretical complications present in the legal field are ultimately not dissimilar to those found in any other interpretative activity that involves the use of a natural-historical language.