Abstract

To the Editor.— I disagree with the contention of Chren et al 1 that drug companies' educational gifts are less corrupting than direct gifts to physicians. I view sponsorship of physicians' education by drug companies as having the potential for more subtle influences on our behavior and therefore as being a much more insidious form of influence than direct gifts. Drug companies ostensibly spend money to provide unbiased, scientifically based information to prescribers of drugs, but they are not going to present such information unless it is favorable to their products. In my remote area, outside speakers from university medical centers often are flown up here with drug companies' money. A professor whose plane ticket has been paid for by a pharmaceutical manufacturer is unlikely to trash that company's products. It is hard to believe that the editors of the many throwaway medical journals we receive are unaware of

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.