Abstract
This chapter examines institutional policies on doctoral publication and supervisor and doctoral student perspectives on those policies. By analysing the focal university’s requirements and rewards schemes for doctoral publication, it reveals that the institutional policies subscribe to neoliberal ideologies, endorse market rationalities, and privilege managerial over professional values and practices. It also delves into supervisor and student perspectives on the institutional requirements and rewards schemes for doctoral publication, showing that the supervisor and doctoral students prioritise internal motivations over external material and symbolic rewards for publishing. These analyses elucidate (mis)alignments between institutional policies and stakeholder perspectives on doctoral publication. This chapter concludes with a critique of the (mis)alignments between institutional policies and stakeholder perspectives, and a discussion of the potential impacts of the institutional policies on doctoral students’ publishing practices and evolving identities.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
