Abstract

AbstractYoung children often struggle with referential communications because they fail to compare all valid referents. In two studies, we investigated this comparison process. In Study 1, 4–7 year-olds (N = 114) were asked to categorize pairs of objects according to their similarities or differences, and then identified a unique quality of one of the objects by responding to a referential question. Children found it easier to judge the differences between objects than similarities. Correct judgments of differences predicted accurate identifications. In Study 2, 4–5 year-olds (N = 36) again categorized according to similarities or differences, but this time were asked for verbal explanations of their decisions. Recognition of differences was easier than recognition of similarities. Explanations of errors were either: (a) ambiguous; (b) color error: (c) thematic (creative imaginative explanations). Children offered thematic explanations when they failed to recognize similarities between objects, but not for errors of difference.

Highlights

  • When we ask young children questions, we have expectations about what constitutes an appropriate response

  • We sought to investigate the recognition of similarities and differences during the comparison process and clarify which predicted children’s ability to recognize identifying information and answer referential questions

  • Older children found the similarity and difference tasks easier than younger children, 7-year-olds performed with few errors and much better than one would expect at standard comparison or referential communication tasks (e.g., Lloyd et al, 1998)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

When we ask young children questions, we have expectations about what constitutes an appropriate response. This is so when the question requires children to identify something: for example, when we ask them about their favorite toy, or what color pencil they want, or even “which” object they are referring to (Basco et al, 2021). We investigated these comparison and communication processes in young children’s responses to referential questions about different object types. In English, referential questions tend to make use of words such as “which” or “what” and, as in the examples given above, tend to refer to objects or their attributes, and require a specific response (Kearsley, 1976; Robinson & Rackstraw, 1972). Referential questions are among the earliest that young children employ (following closely after “why” and “how” questions), and by around 4 years of age are in

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.