Abstract

The adaptation of commercial frameworks to the digital environment has been underway for many years. Well-developed e-commerce regimes have already been developed in major regional trade agreements; the WTO is playing catch up - and it is imperative that it do so, both to make available the benefits of e-commerce to the full range of WTO members and for its own credibility. However, even the most advanced regional trade agreements are struggling to keep up with the rapidly evolving system and the main action in developing new norms for the digital economy is in domestic regulatory sandboxes. The most challenging issue facing the WTO is the new geopolitical security divide that has emerged between the United States and China. The WTO Agreement was framed for a unipolar world, in which “inert” goods and services were traded across borders that could be rigorously policed. This framework is challenged on multiple fronts in a multipolar, online world of smart products. Options to move forward include GATT Article XXVIII/GATS Article XXI renegotiation of WTO commitments across the security divide; conditional MFN in areas where parties agree to appropriate protocols to manage the risks in the digital environment; and a new detente agreement to narrow the range of issues subject to the new national security concerns. An up-front, open and low-rhetoric renegotiation seems infinitely preferable to a high-rhetoric acrimonious decoupling.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.