Abstract
In all available cross-sectional data, the trajectory of the observed wage–experience profile of Russian workers is flat, peaks early, and declines sharply afterwards. This shape looks puzzling since it differs starkly from that observed in both developed and developing countries. We show that a proper interpretation of the wage–experience profile is hindered by the age-period-cohort problem, when the effects of time, cohort, and experience on the wage growth are mixed. Our study uses survey data from Russia covering the years 2000–2019. Relying on human capital theory, we disentangle the experience, period and cohort effects. With certain assumptions concerning human capital depreciation due to aging, our results show that Russian wages do grow monotonically with experience. However, this growth after mid-career is offset by the cohort effect that proceeds in the opposite direction, thus reflecting massive obsolescence of the human capital of workers from older cohorts. Meanwhile, the time effect mirrors the general GDP path as well as all booms and busts over the period.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.