Abstract
Why do some governments prioritize policies that are welfare-improving for many citizens while others concentrate state resources on improving the lot of only a few individuals? Existing research focuses on institutional factors such as regime type and the structure of party systems, but is largely silent on the role of political participation in shaping governments' spending priorities. This paper leverages variation in turnout across Indian state assembly elections from 1967 to 2004 to identify the conditions under which participation matters for government spending. We find that turnout matters in fragmented party systems but has little impact in states characterized by two-party competition. This result has important implications for theories of democratic politics and public good provision.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
