Abstract

The implied volatilities for Swedish equity options show a U-shaped smile pattern when averaged within groups according to the moneyness of the options. This makes the use of at-the-money implied volatilities for valuation of out-of- or in-the-money options questionable. Using at-the-money implied volatilities as benchmark it is, therefore, investigated whether some kind of implied volatility function could lead to more accurate model values. Although the benchmark model performs best for at-the-money options, the use of a volatility function could clearly improve the valuation accuracy for deep in-the-money options. However, no model works very well for options of all moneyness levels.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.