Do soil nutrients mediate competition between grasses and Acacia saplings?

Abstract

AbstractThe structure and composition of savanna vegetation is influenced by resource availability and disturbance. Grasses, a major component of savanna systems, influence the tree‐grass balance by competing with trees for light, water and soil nutrients as well as providing fuel for fires. Overgrazing, and the ensuing decreased grass competition and fire effects resulting from diminished grass vigor and cover, are thought to be major drivers of bush encroachment. To investigate impacts of competition from grass on saplings of Acacia karroo Hayne. and Acacia nilotica (L.). Willd. ex. Del. under high and low soil fertility, six grass species, Aristida junciformis (Trin & Rupr.), Eragrostis capensis (Thunb.) Trin., Hyparrhenia hirta Stapf., Panicum maximum Jacq., Sporobolus africanus (Poir.) Robyns & Tournay and Themeda triandra Forssk., were planted in pots with a tree sapling as the central test species. The major competitive effects experienced by tree saplings were dependent on nutrient level and the identity of the competing grass species (P < 0.001). Aboveground A. karroo was more strongly affected by grass competition under high nutrient conditions, whereas an increase in nutrient level had little effect on the competition between A. nilotica and the grasses (P < 0.001). Acacia karroo was also strongly affected by grass competition belowground; however, the opposite trend was observed for A. nilotica (P < 0.001). Eragrostis capensis was one of the most competitive grass species, reducing sapling aboveground biomass by 85% and 65% under high and low nutrient conditions, respectively, and sapling belowground biomass by 71% on average. Increasing nutrient availability resulted in an increase in competition exerted on A. karroo by all grasses but little to no change for A. nilotica. Changes in savanna composition and structure are thus likely to be influenced by grass species composition and soil nutrient status.