Abstract

There can be several factors that are likely to have played a role in the evolution of hand preference in humans and non-human primates, which the existing theories do not consider. There exists a possibility that hand preference in non-human primates evolved from the pre-existing lateralities in more elementary brain functions and behavior, or alternatively, the two coevolved. A basic example can be a hand-mouth command system that could have evolved in the context of ingestion. In the present study, we examined the relationship between lateralities in prehension and mastication processes, that is, hand and cheek pouch usage, in free-ranging bonnet macaques, Macaca radiata. The macaques preferentially used one hand–the ‘preferred’ hand, to pick up the bananas lying on the ground. Lateralities in hand and cheek pouch usage (for both filling and emptying) were positively related with each other, that is, the macaques used the cheek pouch corresponding to the preferred hand predominantly and before the other. Moreover, when the macaques used the non-preferred hand to pick up the bananas, the frequency of contralateral cheek pouch usage was higher than the frequency of ipsilateral cheek pouch usage, that is, the combined structure of hand, mouth, and food did not influence the relationship between laterality in hand usage and laterality in cheek pouch usage. These findings demonstrate laterality in a relatively more involuntary function than those explored previously in any non-human primate species (e.g., facial expressions and manual gestures).

Highlights

  • The population-level right-handedness in humans raises questions about the evolutionary origins of hand preference, in humans as well as in their phylogenetic relatives, the non-human primates [3]

  • Our research work adhered to the American Society of Primatologists (ASP) ‘‘Principles for the Ethical Treatment of Non-Human Primates.’’ Whereas no authorization from a local authority was required, we conducted the present study as part of a larger study approved by the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee (IAEC) at the University of Mysore

  • There was a positive correlation between the handedness index (HI) and laterality index (LI) values for both filling (Spearman’s rank correlation: rs = 0.825, n = 14, p,0.001; Fig. 1A) and emptying the cheek pouches, and even when the macaques used their nonpreferred hand to pick up the bananas, they predominantly used the cheek pouch corresponding to the preferred hand

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The population-level right-handedness in humans (approximately 90% humans preferentially use the right hand to perform complex manual actions [1,2]) raises questions about the evolutionary origins of hand preference, in humans as well as in their phylogenetic relatives, the non-human primates [3]. Hand preference in non-human primates has been hypothesized to have had evolved owing to functional and morphological adaptations to feeding in arboreal contexts and to be a precursor of the population-level right-handedness in humans [4,5,6]. The postural origins theory fails to describe why initially the left-hand (and not the right hand) became specialized for visually guided reaching, and more importantly, how a population-level right-handedness evolved during the transition from monkeys to apes to humans [8]. There can be several other factors that are likely to have played a role in the evolution of hand preference in humans and non-human primates, which are beyond the scope of these two theories

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call