Abstract
BackgroundBystander affiliation (post-conflict affiliation from an uninvolved bystander to the conflict victim) may represent an expression of empathy in which the bystander consoles the victim to alleviate the victim's distress (“consolation”). However, alternative hypotheses for the function of bystander affiliation also exist. Determining whether ravens spontaneously offer consolation to distressed partners may not only help us to understand how animals deal with the costs of aggressive conflict, but may also play an important role in the empathy debate.Methodology/Principal findingsThis study investigates the post-conflict behavior of ravens, applying the predictive framework for the function of bystander affiliation for the first time in a non-ape species. We found weak evidence for reconciliation (post-conflict affiliation between former opponents), but strong evidence for both bystander affiliation and solicited bystander affiliation (post-conflict affiliation from the victim to a bystander). Bystanders involved in both interactions were likely to share a valuable relationship with the victim. Bystander affiliation offered to the victim was more likely to occur after intense conflicts. Renewed aggression was less likely to occur after the victim solicited affiliation from a bystander.Conclusions/SignificanceOur findings suggest that in ravens, bystanders may console victims with whom they share a valuable relationship, thus alleviating the victims' post-conflict distress. Conversely victims may affiliate with bystanders after a conflict in order to reduce the likelihood of renewed aggression. These results stress the importance of relationship quality in determining the occurrence and function of post-conflict interactions, and show that ravens may be sensitive to the emotions of others.
Highlights
Aggressive conflicts feature regularly in the lives of many groupliving animals over matters such as positions in the dominance hierarchy, access to limited resources, or over decisions that have to be made
When does bystander affiliation occur? We investigated the influence of conflict intensity and the occurrence of solicited bystander affiliation on the occurrence of bystander affiliation using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs)
A survival analysis confirmed the significant tendency for affiliation from a bystander to the conflict victim to occur earlier in the PC than in the matched control (MC) (Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis: Mantel Cox test: N = 152 PCMC pairs, Chi2 = 12.198, P,0.001; Figure 1a), demonstrating the occurrence of bystander affiliation in ravens
Summary
Aggressive conflicts feature regularly in the lives of many groupliving animals over matters such as positions in the dominance hierarchy, access to limited resources, or over decisions that have to be made. Such conflicts, may be costly, using up valuable energy and time and risking injury. One way of reducing the costs of aggressive conflict is through reconciliation, the post-conflict affiliative reunion between former opponents [5], which has been shown to repair the opponents’ relationship and alleviate post-conflict distress [4]. Determining whether ravens spontaneously offer consolation to distressed partners may help us to understand how animals deal with the costs of aggressive conflict, but may play an important role in the empathy debate
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.