Abstract
In this paper, we consider two alternative pure payments systems—the trade of goods for goods, or barter, and trade using intrinsically valueless fiat money. Here, the term payment system refers to the method of executing mutually beneficial trades, and ‘pure’ means that each method of exchange is considered exclusively. Each payment system is examined in an economy with location-specific commodities, and households consist of vendor-shopper pairs. The household’s decision problem includes a distance-related transaction cost; that is, the cost of trading with anyone from another location increases as the distance from the home location increases. We then ask, is the equilibrium set of consumption goods—and the quantity of each type—invariant to whether the vendor or the shopper pays the transaction cost? The answer is that in economies with monetary settlements, invariance fails.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
