Do Patients Living in Rural Areas Report Inferior 1-Year Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Matched Cohort Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundRural status has been associated with poor outcomes for several health problems, but its relationship and outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been fully characterized. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are key measures of success following TKA. Therefore, this matched cohort study was designed to test the hypothesis that patients who live in rural settings will report significantly worse PRO scores 1 year after TKA when compared to those who live in urban or suburban settings. MethodsPatients undergoing TKA at our institution were categorized into urban, suburban, and rural cohorts based on Rural Urban Commuting Area scores using reported living setting zip codes. Cohorts were matched for body mass index classification. Demographic data were extracted from the medical records, and PRO data (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Replacement (KOOS JR), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Global Health and Mental Health, University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score, and Visual Analog Scale Pain were collected preoperatively and 1-year postoperatively. Comparisons across living settings were made using analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests or Chi-square tests. A total of 882 TKA patients (n = 294 per cohort) were analyzed. ResultsPatients living in urban areas had significantly lower preoperative pain scores compared to suburban and rural residents. All measured PROs significantly improved from preoperative levels at 1 year post-TKA with no significant differences among living setting cohorts. ConclusionsIn cohorts matched for body mass index, living in a rural setting was not associated with inferior PROs 1 year after TKA. Level of evidenceLevel 4, retrospective cohort study.