Abstract

Older adults (OA; ≥55years of age) are underrepresented in patients receiving cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). This study evaluates mental health outcomes for OA compared to younger adults (YA; <55years of age) receiving CBT. This is a pre-post study comparing the effectiveness of CBT for OA (n=99) and YA (n=601) in a CBT service located in a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital in Canada. Data was collected between 2001 and 2021. Participants received a mean of 18.5 sessions (SD 10) of standard, evidence-based CBT with treatment integrity checks. The main outcome was clinically significant change, as measured by the Reliable Change Index (RCI). Secondary outcomes were change in the Global Severity Index (GSI-SCL) of the Symptoms Checklist-90 (Revised), and Clinical Global Improvement scores (CGI). The RCI allowed a comparison of treatment efficacy across diagnoses. Both groups experienced similar improvement on the RCI (2.92 [±3.64] vs. 3.15 [±4.86], p=0.65). Furthermore, 39% of OA and 42% of YA no longer met criteria for their diagnoses. Groups did not differ with respect to changes in the GSI-SCL. The CGI severity comparison suggested that OA had milder illness. In all outcomes (RCI, CGI and GSI-SCL), participants improved over time. This real-world study analyzed a large sample of OA and YA undergoing CBT for various mental health conditions. Both groups were found to benefit equally.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call