Abstract

This research explored the ability to learn to identify the pitch class of sine and complex tones. It was hypothesized that pitch-class identification could be improved if octave complexes were used in training. Shepard tones [R. N. Shepard, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 36, 2345–2353 (1964)] were thought to be ideal pitch-class exemplars because they contain only octave-related partials and have an envelope that controls for pitch height. Three groups of undergraduate music majors participated in the study. None had absolute pitch. Subjects were given a pre- and post-test of their ability to name the pitch class of sine tones, various acoustical instrument tones, synthesizer tones, and Shepard tones. Group 1 controlled for maturation effects and did not receive any training. Subjects in groups 2 and 3 attended five training sessions. Digital piano tones were used in group 2 training sessions, while Shepard tones were used for group 3. There were reliable differences between group 2 and group 1 scores. Group 3 scores were higher than group 1 scores, but the difference was not statistically significant. Although results indicate that training facilitates pitch-class naming ability, Shepard tones do not give subjects an advantage over digital piano tones. [Work supported by the Virginia Merrill Bloedel Hearing Research Center.]

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call