Abstract

Although an increasing number of studies in mammals provide support to the Trivers-Willard prediction, evidence of this phenomenon in human remains controver- sial. Here, assuming that contemporary humans respond in an ancestral manner to recent improvements of lifestyle, we explored the hypothesis of a facultative adjustment of sex ratio in relation to resource availability from more than 120 countries worldwide. Although maladaptive at the popula- tion level, we found that sex ratio at birth is significantly more male-biased in nations that are rich, well nourished, and with low fertility. The tendency was weak however, sug- gesting that the magnitude of this effect is small and/or that other processes act to maintain sex ratio equilibrium. These results provide support to the hypothesis predicting invest- ment in costly male offspring when resources are abundant. They also suggest that mechanisms that might have been adaptive under ancestral conditions can produce maladap- tive population-level consequences in the modern world.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.