Abstract

AbstractDisturbance is a central factor shaping composition, structure, and dynamics of local communities. Drying is a disturbance that occurs in aquatic ecosystems globally and can strongly influence their communities. Although the effects of drying may depend on ecosystem connectivity and the dispersal abilities of resident species, there have been no comparisons of community responses to drying between lentic and lotic ecosystems across different climates. Here, we predicted that drying would have stronger effects on aquatic communities in isolated lentic ecosystems than in dendritic lotic ecosystems, owing to the higher hydrological connectivity of the latter, and that drying would have stronger effects on passive than on active dispersers, because of the potentially higher recolonizing ability of the latter. We tested these predictions by comparing alpha diversity, phylogenetic relatedness, and beta diversity for active and passive dispersers, in both ecosystem types across five climatic regions. Drying caused greater declines in alpha diversity in lentic than in lotic ecosystems. Communities that experienced drying were more similar to one another than those of perennial sites, and this pattern was especially pronounced in lentic ecosystems. In contrast, drying did not influence the contributions of turnover and richness gradients to beta diversity. Additionally, dispersal mode did not influence community responses to drying. Relatively weaker effects of drying in lotic compared to lentic systems were likely due to the hydrological connectivity among perennial and temporary river sites, which may facilitate dispersal of organisms to escape drying and recolonize rewetted sites. Collectively, our results suggest that habitat connectivity may ameliorate (and fragmentation may worsen) the impacts of drying disturbance. This is an important finding in light of increasing drying and concomitant aquatic habitat fragmentation under global change.

Highlights

  • Disturbance is a central concept in ecology and is widely recognized to influence populations, communities, and ecosystems (Sousa 1984, Hobbs and Huenneke 1992)

  • Alpha diversity was better explained by the interaction between drying and ecosystem type than by their individual effects or by a random effect

  • Alpha diversity was higher at perennial than at temporary sites, and this pattern was similar in pond and river ecosystems (Fig. 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Disturbance is a central concept in ecology and is widely recognized to influence populations, communities, and ecosystems (Sousa 1984, Hobbs and Huenneke 1992). Drying, defined as the complete disappearance of surface water, represents a major disturbance for aquatic organisms as recognized by most ecologists (e.g., Williams 2006, Greig et al 2013, Leigh and Datry 2016). Drying has been identified as a primary driver of community structure in marine intertidal zones (Dayton 1971), freshwater lentic (Williams 2006), and lotic ecosystems (Boulton 2003). Lentic and lotic ecosystems differ fundamentally in local habitat conditions (e.g., presence or absence of flow, water residence time) and in physical connectivity.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call