Abstract

Pharmaceuticals and their packaging have a significant negative impact on the environment providing a very strong argument for action on the part of pharmacists and pharmacy technicians to engage with pro-environmental behaviours (PEBs) in their workplaces. The aims of this research were therefore to investigate in hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians, 1) factors affecting engagement with workplace PEBs, and 2) determine if legislated carbon reduction targets in the UK influenced workplace PEBs in the UK compared with Australia which does not have legislated carbon reduction targets. The environmentally responsible disposal of pharmaceutical waste was the PEB of interest in this study. A mixed methods research design was utilised and a conceptual model (key variables: environmental attitude, concern, and knowledge, and organisational factors) was developed to identify factors influencing workplace PEBs. Participants were from five hospitals in Queensland, Australia and five NHS hospitals in England, UK. There was no statistically significant difference in environmental attitude or concern between the two groups—most had a mid-environmental attitude score and low levels of environmental concern. Participants lacked knowledge of the issue and the link between the environment and public health. Both Australian and UK participants reported recycling packaging waste was not a priority in the hospital pharmacy workplace (even in hospitals with recycling capability) as hospitals focused on compliance with clinical (contaminated) and confidential waste streams. Environmental attitude, knowledge, and concern therefore appeared to be weak influences on intention to perform workplace PEBs with workplace social norms (compliance due to audits) appearing to be a significant mediator of action. The key difference between the cohorts was that UK pharmacists felt waste was not in the scope of their role, and therefore not their responsibility. This study identified that legislated carbon reduction targets did not influence hospital pharmacy workplace PEBs–neither cohort reported engaging significantly in workplace PEBs. UK Government and NHS sustainability policy did not appear to have disseminated to pharmacy department level of UK public hospitals to any great extent.

Highlights

  • The aims of this research were to, 1) investigate factors affecting the engagement of hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians with the environmentally responsible handling of pharmaceutical waste and, 2) determine if legislated carbon reduction targets influenced workplace PEBs in hospital pharmacists and pharmacy technicians in Australia compared with the UK

  • The Australian cohort comprised 41 pharmacists and 25 pharmacy technicians (n = 66) working at one private hospital and four public hospitals operated by Queensland Health

  • UK Government and National Health Service (NHS) sustainability policy did not appear to have disseminated to the pharmacy department level of UK public hospitals to any great extent

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The National Health Service (NHS) Sustainable Development Unit (SDU) was established in 2008 [4] to develop a strategy for the NHS England to meet its carbon reduction targets under the Climate Change Act of 2008 [5]. In January 2009 the NHS SDU published a Carbon Reduction Strategy for the NHS—a global first, which included a carbon footprint of the NHS [6]. Despite being one of the world’s largest emitters, Australia has no mitigation policy in place (or even being developed) nor climate change legislation [7, 8]. Sustainable development objectives do not appear in Australian State Health Departments’ strategic plans

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.