Abstract

Against the backdrop of rapidly expanding urban structures, land policies in many countries have been adapted to contain and redirect growth to existing urban structures. However, obstacles remain to measure the effects of policies. In the meantime, geoinformation technologies have given rise to a wide range of approaches to measure and describe urban form. Nevertheless, its application for the assessment of land policy has a high, but not yet fully exploited, potential. It is thus the aim of this research to address and investigate the options of spatial analysis and machine learning in particular to analyse urban form from a land policy perspective. To do so, we develop urban metrics informed by urban planning and land readjustment policies of two countries describing urban form on different spatial levels. We therefore formulate hypotheses on causal relations between policy and form. Based on the metrics, we apply the random forest algorithm to classify the building stock of the region. We then extract the residential areas, those with single-family houses, as this is where the effects of the policy are considered most visible. In a next step, we use random forest to predict the nationality of a building. Through variable importance measures, we identify and discuss urban morphological differences between the two countries and test the hypotheses on effects of land policies. We develop and test the approach for the French-German city-region of Strasbourg using OpenStreetMap data. We identify significant differences in the building coverage ratios, which tend to be higher in Germany. This can be linked to differences in planning regulations. Furthermore, German residential areas appear to be more diverse in urban form. Differences in land readjustment policies have proven to be plausible here, as French policies favour strong actors that develop residential areas more uniformly. In Germany, policies favour fragmented ownership-oriented development of residential areas. The metrics and the applied algorithm for building classification have proven to be robust in terms of data heterogeneity and have shown high levels of accuracy. They could also be successfully used for tracing causal relations.

Highlights

  • Urban development is facing substantial challenges, as climate and environmental urgencies need to be addressed

  • We present the results of the classification of the regional building stock and the identification of single-family housing (SFH) areas as well as the results of the comparative analysis of residential urban form in France and Germany

  • We presented a data-driven approach to identify residential areas as a basis for analysing effects of national land policies on urban form and tested it for the French–German cityregion of Strasbourg

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban development is facing substantial challenges, as climate and environmental urgencies need to be addressed. Institutionalist approaches to analyse these settings are of increasing interest, as they set urban development in the context of public policies and private property rights (Gerber et al, 2018) These approaches could establish first links between the interplay of public and private actors and resulting urban morphologies (Buitelaar and Segeren, 2011; Harbers and Tennekes, 2016). The influence of specific institutional settings on urban morphology of urban form is shown by Harbers and Tennekes (2016) through a comparative qualitative study across national systems. They compare differences in urban form at the building level to draw conclusions about the effects of land policies. Research in planning theory explores the link between rationalities in planning systems and their impact on urban form, i.e. urban design (Hartmann and Jehling, 2019)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.