Abstract

While it is intuitively plausible that using contacts in a job search benefits a job-seeker, studies of job-seekers are plagued by theoretical disagreement and inconclusive empirical evidence. In particular, the evidence from between-individual studies — studies that compare outcomes for different individuals — suggests that the relationship between a job-seeker’s social capital and her labor-market outcomes might be spurious. In this paper we exploit a strategic research setting, the school-to-work transition of 291 university graduates who engaged in 3,112 contemporaneous job searches, to conduct a within-individual study comparing outcomes of job searches through contacts and through formal methods for the same individual. We find that even while between-individual tests indicate that contacts do not matter, within-individual tests indicate that job-seekers do benefit from using contacts. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings for the literatures on job search and social networks.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call