Abstract

The present study examined the relationship between social capital, local festival participation, and subjective well-being. Moreover, this study examined whether the effect of social capital on subjective well-being can be mediated by festival participation. In addition, it examined the decomposition effect of festival participation and control of models for demographic characteristics. Data used are from the International Comparative Survey on Lifestyle and Values (ICSLV) SWB South Korea Survey. The total number of respondents for the analysis is 1694. The findings indicate that trustful relationships with family and relatives, friends, and neighbors are considerably related to subjective well-being than structural social capital. Moreover, the trust of informal social ties shows considerable potential in facilitating individuals’ local festival participation, which is associated with subjective well-being. Individuals who often participate in traditional local festivals in their communities show higher subjective well-being than those who never attend any festivals. Local festivals in communities can play an important role in strengthening links with individuals in these communities and affect community residents’ well-being. Lastly, the findings can suggest beneficial theoretical and practical implications, and enrich the previous literature on social capital and festival participation.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe World Bank [1] reported that the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2018 was $USD

  • The World Bank [1] reported that the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2018 was $USD1.619 trillion

  • This study aimed to examine whether social capital is associated with subjective well-being at the individual level

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The World Bank [1] reported that the gross domestic product (GDP) in 2018 was $USD. South Korea ranked 12th in GDP rankings in 2018. Korea’s GDP per capita was $USD 80.2 in 1960 and $USD 33,433.6 in 2018 [2]. Previous literature has indicated that GDP reflects the quality of economic growth, it does not show the quality of growth and balanced distribution of wealth and subjective wellbeing [3]. The gap between the poor and rich has been widening, and social issues related to socioeconomic inequality have remained unsolved [4]. The World Happiness Report [5] provided an alternative indicator to understand wellbeing and happiness, and presented the national happiness of 156 countries.

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call