Abstract
Research Article| December 01, 2009 Do hyperpycnal-flow deposits record river-flood dynamics? Michael P. Lamb; Michael P. Lamb 1Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, 1 University Station C1100, Austin, Texas 78712-0254, USA *Current address: Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, MC 170-25, 1200 E. California Blvd., Pasadena, California 91125, USA. Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar David Mohrig David Mohrig 1Jackson School of Geosciences, University of Texas, 1 University Station C1100, Austin, Texas 78712-0254, USA Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (2009) 37 (12): 1067–1070. https://doi.org/10.1130/G30286A.1 Article history received: 01 Apr 2009 rev-recd: 18 Jun 2009 accepted: 01 Jul 2009 first online: 03 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share MailTo Twitter LinkedIn Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Michael P. Lamb, David Mohrig; Do hyperpycnal-flow deposits record river-flood dynamics?. Geology 2009;; 37 (12): 1067–1070. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/G30286A.1 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Hyperpycnal flows are turbid river plumes that can plunge to form turbidity currents where they enter a water body of lesser density. Because these flows provide one of the most direct connections between terrestrial sediment sources and marine depositional sinks, their deposits might preserve an important record across a variety of climatic and tectonic settings. A leading hypothesis assumes that hyperpycnal-flow velocity scales directly with river discharge, such that individual turbidites record the rising and falling discharge of a flooding river. We tested this hypothesis using a one-dimensional flow model and found that turbid river flow must move through a backwater zone, depth-limited plume, and plunging zone before becoming a turbidity current. These zones can extend tens of kilometers offshore and significantly affect the transfer of momentum from river to turbidity current. Counter to the proposed hypothesis, our results suggest that expected bed forms and sediment grading patterns in hyperpycnal-flow deposits can record multiple flow accelerations and decelerations even during a simple single-peaked flood. This occurs because of spatial acceleration and deceleration within the three transitional zones and because their boundaries move in response to flow discharge and suspended sediment concentration. Results also suggest that the criterion used to identify plunging hyperpycnal flows (a flow density in excess of the ambient fluid) is a necessary, but not sufficient condition. The basin also must be deep enough, in some cases greater than tens of meters, in order for the plume to collapse and form a turbidity current. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.