Abstract

Datura wrightii (Solanaceae), a common shrub in the southwestern United States, bears massive, white, night-blooming flowers that attract and reward hawkmoth pollinators. However, Apis mellifera (honeybee) foragers are often observed on its flowers, especially at dusk and dawn hours. Their foraging activities are focused on the anthers, suggesting they could be pollen thieves. We used a series of observations and manipulative experiments to determine if honeybees are detrimental or beneficial to D. wrightii. We found that honeybees were the most frequent visitors to D. wrightii flowers at both dusk and dawn, and that they removed and carried large amounts of D. wrightii pollen. Flowers were capable of being pollinated at dusk and dawn and a single visit by a honeybee was sufficient to pollinate the flowers and produce fruit. There was no evidence that restricting visitation to diurnal hours yielded fruit set that was different from when we restricted visitation (likely by hawkmoths) to evening hours. These results suggest that honeybees are capable of effective pollination of D. wrightii. Although honeybees might interfere with pollen transmission mediated by their highly specialized hawkmoth pollinators, they may also increase plant fitness by pollinating D. wrightii when hawkmoths are not present.

Highlights

  • Floral tissue can be damaged by animals in a number of ways

  • We examined whether honeybees might act as conditional pollen thieves of D. wrightii

  • We investigated whether floral visitors active at different times differed in their ability to pollinate D. wrightii

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Floral tissue can be damaged by animals in a number of ways It may be consumed (florivory; McCall & Irwin 2006), or may be damaged by foragers that feed upon nectar without concomitant pollination (nectar robbery; sensu Inouye 1980; Irwin et al 2010). Florivory and nectar robbery have received recent attention in the literature (see Irwin et al 2010 and González-Browne et al 2016 for reviews), there are fewer studies that consider the effect of pollen thieves on plant reproductive success (Hargreaves et al 2009). Vaughton (1996) found that pollen-collecting A. mellifera (honeybees) visited male-phase Grevillea barklyana (Proteaceae) but seldom visited female-phase flowers. This habitual theft reduced plant fitness, as flowers caged to allow only honeybee visits set fewer fruit than bagged control flowers. Pronounced spatial separation of anthers and stigmas (herkogamy) in flowers could contribute to theft because a visitor may not be able to transfer pollen to stigmas if the distance between the reproductive organs is too great (Hargreaves et al 2009; Solís-Montero et al 2015)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call