Abstract
AbstractMinimum length limits (MLLs) combined with reduced bag limits are frequently used by fisheries managers to improve size‐structure in Northern Pike Esox lucius populations. We evaluated the effectiveness of a relatively moderate 660‐mm MLL and a two‐fish‐daily bag limit (hereafter, “moderate limit”) and a relatively conservative 813 mm MLL and one‐fish‐daily bag limit (hereafter, “conservative limit”) on size structure of Northern Pike in Wisconsin lakes. We used a before–after‐control–impact design on a series of treatment and reference lakes to test the efficacy of each regulation. Across seven moderate‐limit lake pairs, mean and mean maximum total length (i.e., mean of the 10 longest fish) in treatment lakes did not differ relative to reference lakes, where there was no MLL and a five‐fish‐daily bag limit (relatively liberal; hereafter, “liberal limit”). Across five conservative treatment lakes, there was a significant reduction in mean size relative to references, but mean maximum size increased significantly by an average of 104 mm. A linear mixed‐effect regression of 990 Northern Pike populations similarly suggested that higher size and reduced bag limits were related to improved size structure. Northern Pike populations in the moderate‐limit lakes and conservative‐limit lakes increased by an average of 35 mm and 45 mm, respectively, compared with the liberal‐limits lakes. Size structure was significantly and positively related to increased angler effort and reduced Northern Pike densities and was negatively related to longitude and mean Secchi depth, revealing the importance of lake characteristics in mediating regulation efficacy. Proportional size structure differed significantly between the southern and northern management zones of Wisconsin for the 20 years before and after implementation of regional regulations (moderate limit in south versus conservative limit in north). Analysis of long‐term creel data revealed that catch rates of Northern Pike have been increasing over time, and anglers have focused on fewer, larger fish. We conclude that higher MLLs and reduced bag limits are effective at improving availability of large Northern Pike in Wisconsin lakes but are best utilized in certain lake and population types.Received September 4, 2015; accepted April 11, 2016 Published online August 23, 2016
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.