Do High‐Risk Medicines Alerts Influence Practice?

Abstract

ABSTRACTBackgroundMedicine‐related adverse events are prevalent, costly and mostly preventable. The High Risk Medicines Working Party (Victoria) developed and distributed three high‐risk medicines alerts – wrong route of administration of oral medicines, subcutaneous insulin and unfractionated heparin – and accompanying audit tools in 2008 and 2009.AimsTo determine the impact of the three high‐risk medicines alerts on Victorian health services; to assess the clinical relevance and utility of the audit tools; to identify barriers to implementing recommendations; and to obtain feedback and suggestions for future alert topics.MethodA cross‐sectional survey was undertaken from 6 to 31 July 2009 using an online questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to 90 metropolitan, regional and rural public health services in Victoria and approximately 200 members of the Quality Use of Medicines Network (Victoria).ResultsMost of the 90 respondents were pharmacists (53%) and nurses (31%). 53 (59%) respondents reported making changes as a result of receiving the high‐risk medicines alerts – 21 (40%) concerned the wrong route of administration, 12 (23%) subcutaneous insulin and 7 (13%) unfractionated heparin. Barriers to implementation included time constraints, inadequate staff and resources, excessive paperwork and competing priorities. A minority of respondents indicated some alerts were not relevant to small rural services. Suggestions for improving the audit tools included making them less labour intensive, enabling electronic responses and ensuring their distribution is coordinated with other medicine‐related tools.ConclusionHigh‐risk medicines alerts and the accompanying audit tools facilitated change but there were some barriers to their implementation, such as time and resource constraints. Not all alerts and audit tools were relevant to all health services.