Abstract

AbstractResearch has examined how standardized tests give rise to gender differences in English and STEM attainment, but little research has explored gender differences in classroom‐based attainment and the degree to which these correspond to differences in school‐related attitudes. To explore the extent to which gender‐achievement gaps in classroom‐based performance parallel differences in self‐perceptions and scholastic attitudes. An independent sample of first (n = 187, age 11–12, Study 1) and second‐year students (n = 113, age 12–13, Study 2) from a UK comprehensive secondary school completed a questionnaire measuring academic mindset, self‐efficacy, self‐concept, competence beliefs, personal and social self‐esteem, and endorsement of gender‐subject and career stereotypes. Responses were then matched to their respective classroom grades in English, mathematics, science, and computing. Girls outperformed boys in English in their first year but reported lower global self‐esteem and greater endorsement of science‐career stereotypes. Conversely, girls outperformed boys in mathematics in their second year, but paradoxically reported lower self‐concept and competence beliefs in mathematics and science, and higher competence beliefs in English. Across both studies, mindset, self‐efficacy, competence beliefs, and social self‐esteem were positively related to English attainment; academic self‐efficacy was positively related to mathematics attainment; and mindset, self‐efficacy, self‐concept, and competence beliefs were positively related to science attainment. Gender‐achievement gaps in classroom‐based academic attainment are complex and highly nuanced; they appear to vary between school subjects across years and may not correspond with similar differences in self‐perceptions and scholastic attitudes.

Highlights

  • The observed gender-achievement gap between boys and girls in Western cultures is a key concern for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to understand when and why attainment differences emerge and how to mitigate them

  • Based on theories of achievement motivation, the current study assessed whether gender differences in classroom-assigned English, mathematics, science, and computing grades correspond to similar differences in academic mindset, self-efficacy, self-concept, competence beliefs, global and social self-esteem, and gender stereotype endorsement

  • It is positive that we found few gender differences between girls' and boys' academic attainment and scholastic attitudes and this might reflect upon the school's own efforts to foster learning equality

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The observed gender-achievement gap between boys and girls in Western cultures is a key concern for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners seeking to understand when and why attainment differences emerge and how to mitigate them. Most studies focus on attainment gaps in specific subjects (i.e., girls in mathematics), and few studies explore individual-level factors that may account for gender differences in classroom-based performance (Voyer & Voyer, 2014). Based on theories of achievement motivation (see Elliot & Dweck, 2005, 2007; Elliot, Dweck, & Yeager, 2017), the current study assessed whether gender differences in classroom-assigned English, mathematics, science, and computing grades correspond to similar differences in academic mindset, self-efficacy, self-concept, competence beliefs, global and social self-esteem, and gender stereotype endorsement

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call