Abstract

ABSTRACTBackground: The functional hamstrings/quadriceps ratio (FH/Q) is useful to detect muscle imbalances after stroke. However, is necessary to investigate possible differences between men and women affected by stroke and controls.Objectives: To compare the FH/Q between men and women with stroke and matched controls.Method: Cross-sectional study. Fifty-six participants (10 men – MSTK and 18 women – WSTK with stroke; and 10 men – MCONT and 18 women – WCONT, matched controls) were recruited. The concentric knee extension (conc) and eccentric flexion exercises (ecc) were performed, and peak torque (PT) was used to calculate the FH/Q. Comparisons of PT between sexes (MSTK vs WSTK; MCONT vs WCONT) and comparisons of FH/Q between sexes and groups (MSTK vs MCONT; WSTK vs WCONT), considering dominant vs non-paretic side and non-dominant vs paretic side were performed by ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis test, when applicable.Results: No significant FH/Q differences were found between STK vs CONT and sexes (non-paretic vs dominant). The paretic FH/Q was significantly higher than the non-dominant (CONT), for both sexes. PTconc and PTecc were significant higher for men, considering limbs comparisons. No significant PTecc an PTconc differences were found between STK vs CONT, for men’s non-paretic and paretic limb’s. However, men’s non-dominant limb presented a higher PTconc compared to men’s paretic limbs.Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that individuals affected by stroke had a higher FH/Q in the paretic limb compared to the non-dominant limb of the control group, for both men and women. One interesting finding was the absence of significant FH/Q differences between men and women with stroke.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.